MEMS
Resonant microsensors
TF Consulting provides specialized consulting and management services for high-tech industries, with a core focus on MEMS (Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems) and microsystems technology.We support our clients across the entire product lifecycle with tailored Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) services for sensors, actuators, and complex microsystems. Our expertise includes:
- Development & Innovation – End-to-end support for implementing deep-tech and micromechanics solutions, from concept to series production.
- Technology Fields – Deep know-how in numerical simulation (FEM, CFD, multiphysics), software engineering, sensor technology, semiconductor processes, and data science (AI).
How to create a good sensor design
Our Approach
- For simple structures such as a micro-resonator, we can quickly estimate the desired operating range and the sensor’s characteristic curve using analytical models.
- For complex, coupled systems, we apply advanced numerical methods from mathematical approximation theory to deliver precise, reliable, and optimization-ready results.
This hybrid methodology significantly reduces development time and risk, while enabling you to reach market-ready designs faster and with higher confidence.
Analytical description
where:
- x = length of the resonator (m)
- y = thickness (or characteristic thickness) of the structure (m)
-
Ered ≈1.696×1011 Pa (reduced modulus for silicon, plane stress approximation)
-
ρ(Si) ≈ 2330 kg/m3 (density of silicon)
General form
This formulation clearly shows the strong dependence of resonance frequency on geometry: linearly proportional to thickness and inversely proportional to length squared – a key insight for rapid design iteration of MEMS resonators.
Analytical Scaling
3D plot
Modal Analysis
Beams (1D):
- Analytical solutions exist for many boundary conditions.
Plates (2D):
- More complex; often require numerical methods (like FEM) or approximations.
- Two indices (m,n) for vibration modes.
- Clamped boundaries increase frequencies significantly compared to simply-supported.
Mode Shapes
Features
- Mode 1: Fundamental bending mode (no nodes along the beam except at the fixed end).
- Mode 2–4: Higher-order modes with increasing number of nodes.
- Vertical offset applied for clarity.
These mode shapes are essential when designing resonators, as each mode has a significantly higher natural frequency (scaling roughly with the square of the eigenvalue βₙ).
3D vibration mode shapes
- Mode (1,1) – Fundamental
- Mode (2,1)
- Mode (1,2)
- Mode (2,2)
Color scale: Red = upward displacement, Blue = downward displacement.
Micromechanical sensors
Analytical Modeling
Numerical Simulation
- Finite Element Method (FEM) – for structural mechanics, eigenfrequency analysis, stress/strain distribution, and mode shapes.
- Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) – for damping behavior, squeeze-film effects, or fluidic interactions.
This hybrid approach (analytical + numerical) enables TF Consulting to significantly reduce development time while delivering highly accurate performance predictions for MEMS resonant sensors.
Analytical modeling vs. FEM simulation
|
Aspect
|
Analytical Modeling
|
FEM Simulation
|
|---|---|---|
|
Best suited for
|
Simple geometries (beams, membranes, basic plates)
|
Complex 3D geometries, irregular shapes
|
|
Boundary conditions
|
Ideal / simple (fixed, free, simply-supported)
|
Arbitrary, mixed, or real-world clamping
|
|
Material behavior
|
Homogeneous, isotropic
|
Anisotropic, temperature-dependent, layered materials
|
|
Speed
|
Very fast (seconds)
|
Slower (minutes to hours)
|
|
Accuracy
|
High for ideal cases
|
High for complex real-world conditions
|
|
Multiphysics coupling
|
Limited
|
Excellent (thermo-mechanical, piezo-electric, fluid-structure, etc.)
|
|
Typical use cases
|
Quick frequency estimation, scaling laws, initial design optimization
|
Detailed mode shapes, stress analysis, damping, sensitivity, frequency drift
|
|
Computational resources
|
Negligible
|
Moderate to high
|
|
Insight into internal behavior
|
Good global parameters (e.g. f₀)
|
Full field results (stress/strain, temperature, deformation maps)
|
|
Development stage
|
Early concept & rapid iteration
|
Detailed design validation & optimization
|
Piezoelectric layers
Recommendation
- Start with analytical models for fast exploration and understanding of fundamental scaling laws.
- Switch to FEM + CFD for complex structures, multiphysics effects, and final performance validation.
This combination delivers both speed and accuracy – minimizing development time while ensuring reliable sensor performance.
Focus areas of our Services
Development & Implementation
We support you from the initial idea through the entire development process — including conceptual design, modeling, simulation, and successful implementation of microsystems technology within your organization. Our goal is to turn innovative concepts into reliable, manufacturable products.
Multiphysics Simulation
Cross-Industry Applications
We optimize MEMS components and microsystems for demanding sectors, including:
- Defence technology
- Automotive industry
- Internet of Things (IoT)
- Semiconductor and sensor technology
Our expertise helps clients in high-tech industries achieve competitive advantages through superior sensor and actuator solutions.
Analytical + Numerical Excellence
We follow a smart hybrid methodology:
- Analytical models for quick insights and fundamental understanding.
- High-fidelity FEM & CFD simulations for complex, real-world conditions and final validation.
This combination enables faster development cycles, lower prototyping costs, and superior product performance.
Our Approach: Analytical + Numerical Excellence: We combine the best of both worlds through our hybrid methodology.
GitHub Repositories
- github.com/ThomasFabula/BMFT_FASENS
- github.com/ThomasFabula/Quartz-DETF
- github.com/ThomasFabula/piezoelectric_simulation
- github.com/ThomasFabula/Modeling-of-Resonant-Silicon-Microsensors
Patent
Testimonial
Retrospective











